Another case of misinformation

Just when we thought we only had to worry about our students being misinformed about sex education in schools, (see HB1055) it turns out our newspaper editors need a lesson in fact-checking as well. Yesterday the Springfield News-Leader reported the "morning after" pill was briefly included on an anti-meth bill in the Missouri Senate. Actually, RU-486, or the abortion pill, was tacked on by the Missouri House to a bill tracking controlled substances by pharmacists - it's final inclusion was a clerical error. Even more erroneous is the reporting on the story. Not only is RU-486 not sold or dispensed by pharmacists, the article wrongly identified RU-486 as "an emergency contraceptive ingested orally to prevent or delay ovulation."

LET'S GET THE FACTS STRAIGHT HERE! Emergency contraception, also known as EC, Plan B, or the "morning-after" pill, is a higher dose of birth control which if taken within 120 hours of unprotected sex can prevent pregnancy. EC will not affect a woman who is already pregnant or her pregnancy – EC is NOT an abortion. EC has been approved by the FDA for over-the-counter use for those over the age of 18. RU-486 on the other hand, or a medication abortion, can only be obtained from an abortion provider - not a pharmacist. Additionally, there is a 24-hour waiting period between education about RU-486 and the dispensing of the drug by an abortion provider.

Tell the News-Leader this is not a case of semantics; it’s a case of MISINFORMATION. Comment and write to the News-Leader asking them to correct their story here.

Crystal Brigman is the Grassroots Organizer for Planned Parenthood of Southwest Missouri

MISSOURI HOUSE PASSES ABORTION RESTRICTION BILL

Yesterday, the Missouri House of Representatives voted to pass HCS HB 1831 & 1472 (Onder), the Abortion Restriction Bill of 2008. As the bill moves to the Senate for consideration, Planned Parenthood affiliates in Missouri denounce this bill as an effort to further mandate government intrusion between doctor and patient and create a new crime of 'coercion of an abortion.'

"Missouri already has some of the nation’s strictest laws requiring informed consent and a waiting period for abortion," said Peter Brownlie, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri1. "This is just another attempt by those backing these types of bills to place more unnecessary burdens on the woman and her doctor, and does nothing to actually prevent unintended pregnancies."

"This bill does nothing to protect or empower women but once again inserts politicians into personal and private health care decisions," said Kellie Rohrbaugh, Director of Public Affairs for Planned Parenthood of Southwest Missouri. “This particular measure is only one piece of a larger agenda backed by groups who are working toward an all-out ban on abortion care in Missouri."

This bill includes several provisions that would require 'the physician who is to perform or induce the abortion' to meet with the woman 24 hours before her procedure. Current law already mandates counseling but allows a woman to receive counseling from her own private or preferred physician. The bill also mandates that physicians use brochures and videos developed by state bureaucrats, rather than information provided by trusted medical organizations like the American Medical Association, and to post signs carrying false-promises of state-backed financial assistance if carrying the child to term.

"We already go through the utmost care to make sure that every woman is provided with medically accurate information and that she has spoken with our experienced, professional counselors to make sure she is aware of all her options," said Alison Gee, Vice President of Public Policy at Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region. "The requirement that the counseling be done strictly by the physician who is to perform the procedure may well lead to a delay of days, or possibly weeks, between counseling and the procedure, since many of our physicians are only scheduled one day per week. This is nothing more than election year politics."

The bill also creates a new crime of 'coercion of an abortion,' that broadens the definition of 'coercion' and in many cases would prohibit the woman from consenting to an abortion if she has freely consented and believes this is the best decision for herself based upon her circumstances. In addition, it would make physicians—or anyone assisting them—criminals for helping women obtain an abortion “with knowledge” that the woman has been "coerced" under this new, overly broad definition of 'coercion'.

"This will lead women to stay silent regarding their personal life circumstances and change the informed consent counseling from open and honest conversation about the woman’s well-being to a bureaucratic checklist," said Tonia Stubblefield, CEO of Tri-Rivers Planned Parenthood.

Planned Parenthood opposes HCS HB 1831 & 1472 and will do everything possible to prevent its passage in the Missouri Senate and to protect access to safe and legal health care – including the right to abortion care in Missouri.

For summary language and full text of the bill go to: http://www.house.state.mo.us/billtracking/bills081/bills/hb1831.htm.

####

1 Current Missouri law includes, but is not limited to, the following restrictions:

• A ban on state funding for abortion.
  
• A ban on public facilities or employees being used in the performance of abortions.
  
• A prohibition on insurance companies offering abortion coverage as part of their regular benefits package.
  
• A mandate that women both sign a consent form saying that her decision is free and voluntary and wait at least 24 hours before having an abortion.
  
• A requirement that minors have written parental consent before having an abortion.
  
• A ban on abortions after viability unless necessary to preserve the woman’s life or health.
  

Every year for the past 5 years the Missouri legislature has passed restrictive bills or eliminated programs designed to prevent abortion through family planning and sex education. To view current Missouri law related to abortion care go to: http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/c188.htm

1 in 4...

Recently, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) released an incredibly shocking report. It found that one in four teenage females has a sexually transmitted disease, a rate that increases to one in two for African American teenage females. It also showed that one in five teenage females has HPV, and about half of all teens are having sex.

If you think 'She won't get pregnant if she's on top' is as bad as the myths get, how about these?

• If you mix together baking soda and vinegar and drink it you can get rid of gonorrhea.
• If a guy puts a Q-tip in his ear, gets some ear wax on it and then touches it to the tip of his penis and it burns, then he's got an STD. If it doesn't burn he doesn't have anything.If a girl inserts a tampon after sex it will absorb all the sperm and she won't get pregnant.

In Jefferson City, ignorance is the new black. Rather than supporting the Prevention First Act (PFA) - a bill that promotes proven prevention methods, including comprehensive sex education - Representative Rod Jetton and many other members of the House of Representatives are pushing anti-prevention, anti-choice bills through the legislature time and time again. It's time for the politicking to stop - Missouri teens are in grave danger.

It's time we stopped arguing abortion and started thinking about whether that one teen is ours. We cannot accept this statistic as satisfactory and we certainly cannot allow our legislators to do so either.

Lawsuit Filed

Monday, March 3, 2008: Jefferson City, MO - Today, the Planned Parenthood affiliates in Missouri (PPMO) and the Missouri Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (MORCRC) applauded a legal challenge, filed by Mary Hickey of St. Louis, to the second initiative petition submitted by Illinois-based David Reardon in so many months. This version was certified on February 21st.

“We will fight this initiative because it is dangerous and extreme,” said Peter Brownlie, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri. “I don’t believe the people of Missouri want politicians and bureaucrats deciding what treatments grown adults can receive or what treatments doctors can recommend.”

“The measure is so poorly written with vague and undefined terms so that no one is completely sure what it does, how far it goes or how it could be enforced,” stated Paula Gianino, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region. “What is clear is this measure would force doctors to provide questionable and in some cases false information to their patients instead of the open honest discussion that is best for patients.

“This measure will hurt women and deny them access to the professional health care they deserve because of David Reardon’s politically motivated goals,” stated the Reverend Rebecca Turner, Executive Director of Missouri Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice.

“This measure may seem to target women – but it sets a precedent that politicians and bureaucrats can dictate what treatments any patient can qualify for and what treatments doctors can prescribe,” said Tonia Stubblefield, CEO of Tri-Rivers Planned Parenthood.

The vast majority of Missourians[1] believe that decisions about medical care, including abortion, should be made by a woman in consultation with her doctor. Planned Parenthood and MORCRC stand behind this belief and will stand up for Missourians on this issue. “Missouri already has some of the nation’s strongest laws requiring informed consent and a waiting period for abortion – so it’s clear that the measure is not really about that, it is about extreme politics,” said Kellie Rohrbaugh, Director of Public Affairs for Planned Parenthood of Southwest Missouri.

Planned Parenthood and the Missouri Religious Coalition oppose both of Mr. Reardon’s initiatives and will do everything possible to protect access to safe and legal health care, including the right to abortion care in Missouri.
For the summary language and full text of the initiative go to:
http://www.sos.mo.gov/elections/2008petitions/08init_pet.asp#2008027

NOTE: Tuesday, March 4 is Protect Women’s Health Lobby Day. Teams of activist will be at the Capitol urging their elected officials to support the Prevention First Act and vote NO on HB1831 and SB1058 should they come to a vote.
[1] 63% of Missourians strongly believe the government should not interfere with private healthcare decisions made between a patient and her doctor: Peter D. Hart Research Associates, Sept 07—more information: www.ppmissouri.org

Missouri "abortifacient" bill both wrong and wrong

Well, clearly they've fixed everything else in Missouri, as lawmakers there are now able to turn their attention to fatuous bills addressing pretend situations. The recently introduced HB 1625 would -- contrary to the position of the Food and Drug Administration and virtually the entire medical community -- classify emergency contraception (as in Plan B) as an "abortifacient." It would also allow pharmacies to refuse to dispense both Plan B and RU-486 (mifepristone), shielding them from any resulting legal action.

Where do we start?

1. Pharmacies don't dispense RU-486 in the first place. You get it from your doctor. This is disingenuous.

2. Pharmacies don't dispense anything. Pharmacists do. As NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri'sMississippi as the only state to extend "conscience protection" to pharmacies, conferring the broad right to opt out of dispensing emergency contraception without outlining any grounds for doing so. The wholesale opt-out would be unenforceable at best. executive director, attorney Pamela L. Sumners, notes: Pharmacies are corporations, not individuals with "consciences" or "conscience rights." Solid precedent holds that nonsectarian private companies "do not have 'religious' views that are entitled to legal protection." (See United States v. Lee, 1982.) Were the bill to pass, Missouri would join

3. The bill may also violate Missouri's Human Rights Act, which forbids discrimination based on sex, and possibly even Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

It's a bad, bad bill, politically and legally. Too bad to become reality? Maybe, maybe not. And it's hard to see how the reproductive-rights situation can get much worse in Missouri to begin with. Still, we can't dismiss this bill as harmless grandstanding. Why not? Well, it's like when a courtroom lawyer says "[question] withdrawn" or a judge asks for something to be stricken from the record. Either way, the jury still hears it. And in this case, what people hear is:

1. Emergency contraception and RU-486 are the same (sic).

2. Women can get abortions, along with mouthwash and Milk Duds, at their local Walgreens (sic).

All of which plays into -- and reinforces -- the frequently peddled notion that women need reining in, as does our alleged qwik-abortion culture. It all adds up, even drop by drop, and helps cement public perception. So even if those misconceptions don't actually get this bill passed, the damage, in no small part, will still be done.

Article by Lynn Harris - as posted on salon.com

1984?

"The "Party" has taken over all aspects of life... Winston is painfully aware of the telescreen, which is both a receiver and transmitter at the same time. It incessantly relays messages from the Party and simultaneously allows the dreaded "thought police" to tune into the activities of any individual at any given time." www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984

The most recent claims to reproductive fame by Rep. Therese Sander was handling the abominable sex mis-education/abortion restriction bill last year. She was also the sole sponsor of a bill that would have ascribed a 'conscience' to corporations, employers, and insurance companies allowing them to deny health services to patients based upon personal beliefs and ideological values. Among the many terrible bills with Rep. Sander's name are:

• a bill that would protect denying pharmacists;
• a bill that would require parental consent for birth control for teens; and
• a bill establishing an 'alternatives to abortion' program that categorically cannot provide family planning services (the best 'alternative to abortion').

But her piece de resistance - filed this year - is a bill that would require doctors who perform abortions to ask women why they are seeking an abortion, then report that information to the state government!

It is filed as HB1984; could that be intentional, or is it some kind of Orwellian slip?

1984...hmmm, makes a girl think back to high school and learning the definition of dystopia.

Can you spell 'Big Brother'?

Alison Gee is the Vice President of Public Policy at Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region

What We've Done.

Governor Blunt claims he wants to help and protect Missourians. He says that everything he does is ‘for Missourians’. Problem is, there’s a world of difference between what Governor Blunt thinks that we want to hear and what we are demanding to know. In Missouri, political rhetoric constantly trumps women’s healthcare and thousands of Missouri students sit in classrooms where sex ed lessons are medically, factually inaccurate - something Blunt considers a "mission accomplished". Our Governor has failed. In a state that encompasses cities with some of the highest STI rates in the country, Governor Blunt traded his sense of ‘protecting Missourians’ long ago in order to gain political clout with his group of hardline fans. Unfortunately, regular Missourians don’t feel so 'protected.'

Governor Blunt just announced he is not running for re-election. Just as well ... Missouri voters, like you, understand that votes matter and have already told us that you strongly support state funds for family planning (69%*), that you believe pharmacies should dispense birth control without discrimination or delay (65%*), that you believe sex education should be comprehensive (76%*), and that the government should not step between a patient and her doctor (63%*). Not what Governor Blunt wants to hear. But, together, we say "enough is enough to failed policies and failed politicians." [*statewide poll conducted September 2007]

This legislative session, we need your help to keep pushing forward. In Jefferson City, there have already been seven bills introduced that restrict Missourians' access to Planned Parenthood programs and services. Then there's the shadowy Task Force - the sham group Governor Blunt created that could - any day now - release unscientific and unhelpful 'results.'

Let your friends know about the REAL Task Force to Protect Women’s Health and Lives. Let them know that we are the informed majority and that this Session, we are showing our power in the Capitol through activists and supporters across this state.